Template talk:Pl
{{#ifeq: {{Template:{{{1|}}}/Metadata|info=status}}|0
|{{#if: {{{2|}}} | [[{{{1|}}}
|<font color="#006400">{{{2|}}}</font>]]
|[[{{{1|}}}|<font color="#006400">{{{1|}}}</font>]]}}
|{{#ifeq: {{Template:{{{1|}}}/Metadata|info=status}}|1
|{{#if: {{{2|}}} | [[{{{1|}}}
|<font color="#B8860B">{{{2|}}}</font>]]
|[[{{{1|}}}|<font color="#B8860B">{{{1|}}}</font>]]}}
|{{#ifeq: {{Template:{{{1|}}}/Metadata|info=status}}|2
|{{#if: {{{2|}}} | [[{{{1|}}}
|<font color="#ff8c00">{{{2|}}}</font>]]
|[[{{{1|}}}|<font color="#ff8c00">{{{1|}}}</font>]]}}
|{{#ifeq: {{Template:{{{1|}}}/Metadata|info=status}}|3
|{{#if: {{{2|}}} | [[{{{1|}}}
|<font color="#ff4500">{{{2|}}}</font>]]
|[[{{{1|}}}|<font color="#ff4500">{{{1|}}}</font>]]}}
|{{#ifeq: {{Template:{{{1|}}}/Metadata|info=status}}|4
|{{#if: {{{2|}}} | [[{{{1|}}}
|<font color="#DC143C">{{{2|}}}</font>]]
|[[{{{1|}}}|<font color="#DC143C">{{{1|}}}</font>]]}}
|{{#if: {{{2|}}} | [[{{{1|}}}
|{{{2|}}}]]
|[[{{{1|}}}]]}} }} }} }} }} }}
Joe, what is the plan for the 2 parameter, I note you have not used it on the priority list. Could it not be shortened to the following?
{{#ifeq: {{Template:{{{1|}}}/Metadata|info=status}}|0
|[[{{{1|}}}|<font color="#006400">{{{1|}}}</font>]]
|{{#ifeq: {{Template:{{{1|}}}/Metadata|info=status}}|1
|[[{{{1|}}}|<font color="#B8860B">{{{1|}}}</font>]]
|{{#ifeq: {{Template:{{{1|}}}/Metadata|info=status}}|2
|[[{{{1|}}}|<font color="#ff8c00">{{{1|}}}</font>]]
|{{#ifeq: {{Template:{{{1|}}}/Metadata|info=status}}|3
|[[{{{1|}}}|<font color="#ff4500">{{{1|}}}</font>]]
|{{#ifeq: {{Template:{{{1|}}}/Metadata|info=status}}|4
|[[{{{1|}}}|<font color="#DC143C">{{{1|}}}</font>]]
|[[{{{1|}}}]]}} }} }} }} }}
Chris Day (talk) 05:35, 17 September 2007 (CDT)
Parameter 2 is used a couple of times. It replicates normal links that are piped. So [[Maya peoples|Maya]] becomes {{pl|Maya peoples|Maya}} --Joe Quick (Talk) 14:32, 17 September 2007 (CDT)
Now I get it. I misread the code. But do we need to pipe links in a priority list? Or is that you thinking ahead to article space? Chris Day (talk) 16:08, 17 September 2007 (CDT)
We probably don't really need to pipe links in a priority list. It just looks kind of silly to have the word "language" so many times in such a short list:
There are a few other similar situations, and it allows me to write things like "
This is an example of an approved article" but it wouldn't be a big deal to drop the piping. --Joe Quick (Talk) 17:07, 17 September 2007 (CDT)
- Don't get me wrong, i think it could be useful, i just was not sure where you were taking it. Chris Day (talk) 21:41, 17 September 2007 (CDT)
Red link icon?
What about having an icon for nonexisting pages?
That would be easy to do but I wonder if it is really necessary since those articles still show up as red links anyway. --Joe Quick (Talk) 09:54, 28 September 2007 (CDT)