Orch-OR

From Citizendium
Revision as of 07:25, 12 May 2010 by imported>Chris Day (is high way a better analogy than conveyor belt. The latter gives the impression that the microtubules are moving.)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This article is a stub and thus not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

Orch OR (Orchestrated Objective Reduction) is the proposal that information processing in the brain involves complex computational processes within every neuron, that involve co-ordinated changes in the conformational states of tubulin proteins within microtubules. The proposal was put forward in the mid-1990s by British theoretical physicist Sir Roger Penrose and American anesthesiologist Stuart Hameroff.

Microtubules are cylindrical lattices of tubulin proteins that serve as structural elements inside a cell and can act like "highways" for the movement of vesicles, granules, organelles like mitochondria, and chromosomes to different locations in the cell via special motor proteins; they are also important components of cilia and flagella in motile cells, and are importany for mitosis in all cells. Structurally, microtubules are linear polymers of a globular protein, tubulin - these linear polymers are called protofilaments.

Roger Penrose had argued in his 1989 book The Emperor's New Mind that human consciousness and understanding required a factor outside algorithmic computation, and that the missing “non-computable” factor was related to a type of quantum computation involving what he termed objective reduction (OR). Hameroff suggested to Penrose that microtubules within neurons might be involved in such quantum computation, and together they developed the theory of Orch OR [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]. [6] [7] [8] [9]

A few papers have been published criticising specific features of the theory, but largely it has been ignored by academic neuroscientists.

[10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17][18] [19] [20]

References

  1. Hameroff SR, Penrose R (1996) Orchestrated reduction of quantum coherence in brain microtubules: A model for consciousness. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation 40:453-480
  2. Hagan S et al. (2002) Quantum Computation in Brain Microtubules? Decoherence and Biological Feasibility. Physical Rev E 65: 061901
  3. Hameroff SR, Penrose R (1996) Conscious events as orchestrated spacetime selections. J Consciousness Studies 3:36-53
  4. Hameroff S (1998) Quantum computation in brain microtubules? The Penrose-Hameroff "Orch OR" model of consciousness Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser A 356:1869-96
  5. Hameroff S (1998b) "Funda-mentality": is the conscious mind subtly linked to a basic level of the universe? Trends Cognitive Sci 2:119-27
  6. Hameroff S (1998d) Did consciousness cause the Cambrian evolutionary explosion? In: Toward a Science of Consciousness II: The Second Tucson Discussions and Debates. Eds. Hameroff, S.R., Kaszniak, A.W., & Scott, A.C., Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp.421-37
  7. Hameroff SR, Watt RC (1982) Information processing in microtubules. J Theor Biol 98:549-61
  8. Hameroff SR et al. (2002) Conduction pathways in microtubules, biological quantum computation and microtubules. Biosystems 64:149-68
  9. Hameroff SR (1998). "Quantum computation in brain microtubules? The Penrose-Hameroff "Orch OR" model of consciousness". Philosophical Transactions Royal Society London (A) 356: 1869–1896.
  10. Grush, R., Churchland, P.S. (1995). "Gaps in Penrose's toilings". Journal of Consciousness Studies 2 (1): 10–29. [e]
  11. Penrose R, Hameroff SR (1995) What gaps? Reply to Grush and Churchland. J Consciousness Studies 2:98-112
  12. Penrose is Wrong Drew McDermott, PSYCHE, 2), October, 1995
  13. Minds, Machines, And Mathematics - A Review of Shadows of the Mind by Roger Penrose David J. Chalmers, PSYCHE 2 June 1995
  14. Reimers JR et al. (2009). "Weak, strong, and coherent regimes of Fröhlich condensation and their applications to terahertz medicine and quantum consciousness". Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 106: 4219–24.
  15. Georgiev DD (2007). "Falsifications of Hameroff-Penrose Orch OR model of consciousness and novel avenues for development of quantum mind theory". NeuroQuantology 5: 145–74.
  16. Georgiev DD (2009). "Remarks on the number of tubulin dimers per neuron and implications for Hameroff-Penrose Orch". NeuroQuantology 7: 677–9. [e]
  17. Georgiev DD (2009). "Tubulin-bound GTP cannot pump microtubule coherence in stable microtubules. Towards a revision of microtubule based quantum models of mind". NeuroQuantology 7: 538–47.
  18. McKemmish LK et al. (2009). "Penrose-Hameroff orchestrated objective-reduction proposal for human consciousness is not biologically feasible". Physical Rev E 80: 021912–6.
  19. Spier E, Thomas A (1998)A Quantum of Consciousness? A glance at a physical theory for a mind Trends Cognitive Sci 2:124-5
  20. Tegmark, M (2000), "Importance of quantum decoherence in brain processes", Phys Rev E 61: 4194–206