Determinism

Determinism as a philosophical position is summarized in the "consequence argument":

Consequence Argument: If determinism is true, then our acts are the consequences of the laws of nature and events in the past. But it is not up to us what went on before we were born, and neither is it up to us what the laws of nature are. Therefore the consequences of these things (including our present acts) are not up to us.

From a scientific standpoint, determinism takes the form of physical determinism. A law of nature is deterministic if its theoretical formulation connects certain physical states ineluctably to others. Physical determinism is based upon connections between 'events' supplied by a theory:

"a theory is deterministic if, and only if, given its state variables for some initial period, the theory logically determines a unique set of values for those variables for any other period." —Ernest Nagel Alternative descriptions of physical state, p. 292

The idea of 'cause-and-effect' is replaced with that of 'logical implication' according to one or another theory that connects events. There is no implication here of 'cause' and 'effect', but merely the theoretical implication that certain 'states' are connected to other 'states', which may be earlier or later in time. These physical states may be described in various ways, for example, using wavefunctions that determine the probabilities of observable events involving individual 'elementary' particles, or using the specification of gross variables, like temperature and pressure, that have meaning only for large enough numbers of particles to allow a statistical interpretation.

The philosophical position can be interpreted to be independent of the precise form of the 'laws of nature', although any reference to "the past" may be problematic, and any supposed implication of 'causation' is to be replaced by something closer to 'association' via an empirically grounded theoretical apparatus.