James Clerk Maxwell

From Citizendium
Revision as of 03:59, 9 August 2008 by imported>Paul Wormer (→‎Molecular velocity distribution)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This article has a Citable Version.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
Addendum [?]
 
This editable Main Article has an approved citable version (see its Citable Version subpage). While we have done conscientious work, we cannot guarantee that this Main Article, or its citable version, is wholly free of mistakes. By helping to improve this editable Main Article, you will help the process of generating a new, improved citable version.

James Clerk Maxwell (Edinburgh, June 13, 1831 – Cambridge, November 5, 1879) was a Scottish physicist best known for his formulation of electromagnetic theory and the statistical theory of gases. He is regarded by most modern physicists as the scientist of the 19th century who had the greatest influence on 20th-century physics, and he is ranked with Galileo Galilei, Isaac Newton, Albert Einstein, and the main creators of quantum mechanics Werner Heisenberg, Erwin Schrödinger, and Paul A. M. Dirac.

He gave his name to the Maxwell equations, the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution, and the unit of magnetic flux, the maxwell.

James Clerk Maxwell.jpg

Biography

Family

James Clerk Maxwell came from two prominent and affluent Scottish families, the Maxwells and the Clerks, both of lower nobility and heavily interrelated.[1]

James' father, John, was a younger paternal grandchild of Sir George Clerk, and accordingly was simply named John Clerk, while his elder brother had inherited the title and name of their grandfather, and thus was also called Sir George Clerk. John added legally the name Maxwell later, after he had inherited from his grandmother (Dorothea, née Lady Clerk Maxwell), the Middlebie estate in the Galloway area. Galloway is a region in the South-West of Scotland; the estate is 10 km North of Castle Douglas, the market-town, and about 70 km West from the town of Middlebie, in Dumfriesshire.

After marrying Frances Cay in 1826, John Clerk Maxwell and his bride moved from Edinburgh to the Middlebie estate. He and Frances built a country house there, named Glenlair. The house was in a rather isolated spot, even for Scottish standards, far removed from any cities, the closed cities being Glasgow (110 km to the North, a full day's journey at the time) and Edinburgh, which was two whole days of travel.

Early youth

James was born in Edinburgh, where his parents had gone to ensure proper medical attention at his birth. James was the first son of his mother, who had lost previously a daughter of a few months old. Mrs. Clerk Maxwell had the relatively advanced age of forty when she gave birth to James. Soon after the birth the family went back to the Glenlair House. James, who remained an only child, was brought up in the Galloway region, where he played with the local children and acquired a thick Scottish accent, in spite of his upperclass descent. He would never quite lose his accent.

Maxwell's mother died in 1839 from abdominal cancer, the same disease to which Maxwell was to succumb at exactly the same age of forty-eight years. James grew up alone with his father with whom he had a happy and close relationship. At young age James received private lessons from a dull and uninspired tutor, who claimed that James was slow at learning, though in fact he was very inquisitive and had a phenomenal memory. At the age of ten James was sent to the Edinburgh Academy to receive a proper education. During term time, he was living either with his mother's sister Jane Cay, who was unmarried, or with his father's sister Isabella, the widow of James Wedderburn. Both aunts lived in Edinburgh. At the academy he became a life-long friend of Peter Guthrie Tait, who would become also a distinguished mathematical physicist and one of the advocates of Hamilton's quaternion theory. In the beginning James had a difficult time at school because of his Galloway accent and because he wore strange, but practical, clothes, designed by his father.

At school Maxwell was showing unusual mathematical ability, and at the age of fifteen invented by analogy with the construction of an ellipse a way of drawing ovals using a piece of string. This work was published in the Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, and although not an important paper, it is remarkable for such a young author.

Student days

At the age of sixteen Maxwell entered Edinburgh University. He was not unusually young to enter a Scottish Unversity. At that time these were hybrids between modern day secondary schools and universities. Maxwell studied mathematics, philosophy, and physics and left after three years without graduating to go up to Cambridge, at first to Peterhouse College, which housed many Scotsmen, and after one term to Trinity College.

By the time he entered Cambridge University, Maxwell was very knowledgeable about English literature and was himself a reasonably good poet. And, of course, he had a vast knowledge of mathematics and physics. In his first year at Cambridge he had to undertake systematic studies, as any student, although he had already a few papers, one of them a valuable one on elasticity. His tutor, the mathematician William Hopkins, noted his strong geometrical insight but also that in analysis his powers were somewhat less. Maxwell followed the lectures by G. G. Stokes and met William Thomson again, whom he had first met while at Edinburgh University.

In 1854 Maxwell was second wrangler (second place at the competitive exam the "mathematical tripos") and shared Smith's prize (a prestigious competitive award for an essay that incorporates original research). He was elected to a fellowship at his college, Trinity, and started serious research on two of his favorite topics, color theory and electromagnetism.

Aberdeen

Clerk Maxwell kept his fellowship at Trinity only for a short time. Because his father's health was deteriorating, he looked for, and found, a professorship in Scotland. He hoped that the long vacations of Scottish universities would permit him to spend many months each year at his beloved Glenlair with his father. In addition, some of Maxwell's letters to his father seem to indicate that the prospect of becoming a Cambridge "Don" did not appeal to him, as he recognized the narrowing tendencies of college life. He became professor of natural philosophy at Marischal College, Aberdeen, but before the appointment was announced his father died, early April 1856. In June 1858, Maxwell married Katherine Mary Dewar, the daughter of the principal of Marischal College and seven years James' senior. The marriage remained childless.

Maxwell's most important work in Aberdeen, besides the continuation of his studies on color, was a theoretical study on the nature of Saturn's rings. He proved that the rings must consist of myriad small particles, or moonlets, each in their own orbit around the planet and that the ring could not be solid. Maxwell was awarded the £130 Adams Prize in 1859 for his essay On the Stability of Saturn's Rings.

During his time in Aberdeen Maxwell was nominated twice for a Royal Medal of the Royal Society for his work on the perception of color, and twice he was passed. But a nomination in May 1860 by G. G. Stokes and William Hallowes Miller (Cambridge professor of mineralogy) for the Rumford Medal was successful.

In 1860 the King's College and Marischal College, both in Aberdeen, merged forming the nucleus of what would become Aberdeen University. Maxwell was made redundant, even though he was the son-in-law of one of the principals, and had won the very prestiguous Rumford medal and the Adams Prize.

Shortly before the Aberdeen merging of colleges, the Chair of Natural Philosophy at Edinburgh became vacant in the fall of 1859, because Maxwell's old teacher and friend James D. Forbes had moved to a less demanding post in St Andrews. Maxwell and several of his contemporaries were applicants for this post, including Peter Guthrie Tait and Edward John Routh. The latter had beaten Maxwell at the mathematical tripos in Cambridge. Tait was chosen for the Edinburgh chair; he was preferred over Maxwell because it was felt that he was the better teacher of the two.

After having lost his position in Aberdeen and being jobless, Maxwell and his wife headed to Glenlair. However, soon he found another job; in July 1860 the ex-professor of Aberdeen was appointed to the vacant Professorship of Natural Philosophy in King's College, London. Almost immediately after hearing the good news, before moving to London, he suffered an attack of smallpox in September 1860. His servants were afraid to come into the room where Maxwell laid sick, because smallpox is very contagious and life-threatening, but his wife nursed him lovefully and soon he recovered.

London

The work at King's College was more exacting than that in Aberdeen. There were nine months of lecturing in the year, and evening lectures to artisans, etc., were recognised as a part of the Professor's regular duties. Maxwell retained the post until the spring of 1865, when he was succeeded by Professor W. G. Adams, but continued lecturing to the working men during the following winter. In London Maxwell did most of his great work on electromagnetism, but he also worked on his color theory and kinetic theory of gases. His earliest biographers, Lewis Campbell and William Garnett[2], relate about this time:

During most of the King's College time Maxwell resided at 8 Palace Gardens Terrace, Kensington, where he carried on many of his experiments in a large garret which ran the whole length of the house. When experimenting at the window with the colour-box (which was painted black, and nearly eight feet long), he excited the wonder of his neighbours, who thought him mad to spend so many hours in staring into a coffin. This was also the scene of his well-known experiments on the viscosity of gases at different pressures and temperatures. For some days a large fire was kept up in the room, though it was in the midst of very hot weather. Kettles were kept on the fire, and large quantities of steam allowed to flow into the room. Mrs. Maxwell acted as stoker, which was very exhausting work when maintained for several consecutive hours. After this the room was kept cool, for subsequent experiments, by the employment of a considerable amount of ice.

In 1861 Maxwell became fellow of the Royal Society of London, which entitled him to the affix FRS.

Glenlair

In 1866 Prof. and Mrs. Maxwell returned to Glenlair, mainly because of the ill health of the former. While out riding—Maxwell was a fervent horseman—he had grazed his head on a tree branch and the wound had led to a severe attack of erysipelas, an inflammatory disease characterized by severe headaches and vomiting. There is reason to suspect that Maxwell's earlier bout of smallpox had made him sensitive for this disease.

During the years at Glenlair he began writing his celebrated two volume treatise on electricity[3]. It is of interest to note, that while Maxwell's original paper of 1865 did not use quaternions—all equations were written out in components—in this work quaterions are used extensively. In his treatise Maxwell refers to a book on quaternions by his friend P. G. Tait[4]. There is evidence[5] that Maxwell familiarized himself with Hamilton's quaternions as late as the early 1870s. Later, Maxwell's equations were recast by Oliver Heaviside into the vector form that is still in use today.

During his Glenlair period that lasted until 1871, Maxwell served as examiner and moderator at Cambridge in 1866, 1867, 1869, and 1870, instituting important and useful reforms in the tripos.

Maxwell was a deeply pious man. Lewis Campbell and William Garnett record that visitors to Glenlair between 1866 and 1870 were struck with the manner in which the daily prayers were conducted by the master of the house. The prayers, which seemed extempore, were most impressive and full of meaning.

Back to Cambridge

In 1870 Cambridge University received a splendid gift from William Cavendish, the seventh Duke of Devonshire, who had been second wrangler in 1829, and was then Chancellor of the university. The duke, directly related to Henry Cavendish, gave the university £6300 for the construction of a physics laboratory. In 1869, a physical sciences syndicate had recommended the foundation of a physical laboratory and the estabishment of a chair in experimental physics. Up until then there was no general laboratory in Cambridge, the physics fellows experimented at home or in their colleges. As always, there were insufficient funds to implement the committee's recommendation, which led the duke to intervene and make his splendid offer. The laboratory was to be called the Cavendish laboratory and the new chair (£500 per annum) was to be the Cavendish professorship of experimental physics.

W. Thomson and Hermann von Helmholtz were approached for the job, but both declined. Maxwell, now considered the greatest of the three, was elected in 1871. He thus was the first Cavendish professor.

Maxwell devoted great energy to the building and equipment of the new laboratory. It was ready for occupation and functioning in 1874 (and would stay in the same place for a full century, the Cavendish moved to a new location in West Cambridge in 1974). Maxwell had started lecturing in October 1871, and in his long inaugural lecture he expressed in detail his philosophy of teaching physics and the function of the laboratory for teaching and research.

During his last Cambridge period, Maxwell undertook the publication of Henry Cavendish's electrical papers. The manuscripts had been gathering dust for about a century. It is believed that they would have influenced greatly the development of electric science had they been known. Cavendish's eccentricity kept them from being published.

In the summer of 1879, when he was forty-eight years old, Maxwell showed signs of the same abdominal cancer that had killed his mother when he was eight. He died November 5, 1879, the year that his great admirer Albert Einstein was born.

Scientific work

Color Theory

Clerk Maxwell started studies on color vision while still at Edinburgh, under guidance of Professor James David Forbes. Fundamental progress on color theory—a subdiscipline of physiological optics—had been made earlier by Thomas Young, who had arrived at the conception of three fundamental colors, red, green, and blue.[6] Maxwell continued Young's investigations by studying color perception with a spinning top that allowed quantitatively measuring of the colors being mixed. Maxwell's work contributed importantly to the unraveling of the mysteries surrounding color vision. As a spin-off of his researches, he was able to show the first ever color slide, which he projected at the Royal Institution on 17 May 1861.[7] A hundred years later it was found[8] that Maxwell was lucky that his strategy in designing the slide worked, because ultraviolet acted as a proxy for red in the recording stage, a fact that Maxwell was not aware of. In any case, his slide projection greatly impressed his audience.

The work of Young and Maxwell is known today to any computer user who is trying to create his own colors by the RGB color scheme.[9]

Saturn's rings

The planet Saturn has a flat circular ring, first observed by Galileo Galilei in 1610, but not understood by him. The Dutch physicist Christiaan Huygens recognized it as a ring in 1655 and twenty years later Giovanni Domenico Cassini saw that there were actually two rings. In 1850 the Harvard astronomer George Phillips Bond discovered a dark obscure ring interior to the two rings known since the 17th century. On a visit to Europe in 1851 Bond spoke about his discovery in Cambridge where he aroused the interest of James Challis, the Plumian professor of astronomy. The mechanical stability of the ring was hardly understood at that time. The great Laplace had studied it and found that a solid uniform ring would be dynamically unstable and could not revolve permanently about the planet.

Challis set the stability of Saturn's rings as the subject of the 1857 Adams Prize essay. This prize had been established in 1848 by a few members of St. John's college of Cambridge University in honor of John Couch Adams' prediction of the existence of the planet Neptune. Only Cambridge graduates could enter the competition. Clerk Maxwell took up the challenge and submitted his essay on 16 December 1856; Maxwell's was the only submission.

In the first part of his essay he showed that the rings cannot be homogeneously solid, because, in accordance with Laplace's earlier finding, they would be unstable. The gravitational gradient arising from the main body of the planet would generate stresses that normal matter could not withstand.

In the second part of his prize essay Maxwell assumed that the rings were fluid (but not at rest because they would then collapse into Saturn). This assumption fared no better under realistic conditions because of the development of destabilizing waves. Therefore he ended up by the assumption that the only system of rings which can exist is one composed of an indefinite number of unconnected solid particles, revolving around the planet with different velocities according to their respective distances. He thus concluded that the rings consisted of what were effectively clouds of small solid satellites. This is the correct description as confirmed by the Voyager 2 space probe in 1981.

Maxwell was awarded the Adams prize on 30 May 1857. Two years later he summarized his more than 80 pages essay in a short article.[10]

Molecular velocity distribution

Kinetic gas theory was established by Daniel Bernouilli in 1738 in a chapter of his book Hydrodynamica. Bernouilli assumed an elastic fluid (i.e., a gas) to consist of "very minute corpuscles, which are driven hither and thither with a very rapid motion".[11] Bernouilli was the first to recognize that pressure is caused by collisions of the particles with the walls of the vessel containing the gas, and that the speed of the particles increases with increasing temperature. In the nineteenth century the kinetic theory of gases was pursued, among others, by James Prescott Joule in England and Rudolf Clausius in Germany. Especially the latter worker had a determining influence on Maxwell.

Sometime early 1859 Maxwell read a translation of a paper by Clausius, in which the mean path length—the distance covered by molecules beween successive collisions—played an important role.[12] It is likely that Clausius' paper drew Maxwell's attention because he had just finished his work on Saturn's rings in which he had considered the motions and path lengths of myriads of small particles. Maxwell became interested in viscosity, diffusion rates, and other transport properties of gases.

In his earlier investigations, Clausius assumed that all molecules move with the same speed. He used the mean value of the square of the velocity of molecules as the speed of the molecule in the gas. Before Maxwell, Clausius never thought of velocity distributions, which express the percentages of molecules that have velocities differing from the average velocity. Maxwell, who saw clearly that such statistical distributions could be physically important, wrote a memoir for the British Association in 1859, in which he gave the velocity distribution of the molecules in a gas. He also calculated the viscosity coefficient of a gas in terms of mean free paths, and wrote about diffusion, and the conduction of heat.[13]

In his kinetic work, Maxwell relies heavily on statistical ideas. Maxwell's interest in probability theory dated back to 1850 when he read an essay by John Herschel on the work by the Belgian social scientist Adolphe Quetelet, Theory of Probabilities. Later, in 1857, he read the first volume of Henry Thomas Buckle History of Civilization in England, in which Quetelet's statistical methods are applied to history. It is likely that Maxwell's interests in contemporary debates on statistics led him to applications of probability methods in his 1860 papers on the dynamical theory of gases. The introduction of statistical factors into the treatment of appropriate physical problems must be regarded as one of Maxwell's foremost contributions to the advance of physics.

In his 1860 papers Maxwell used simplified models of a perfect gas in which the principal interaction between molecules occurred during collisions. On the assumption that the three orthogonal components, vx, vy, and vz, of the velocity distribution are independent, he demonstrated that the distribution of total velocities (speeds), v2vx2 + vy2 + vz2, among the molecules in the assembly would be governed by a function of the form

in which A is related to the density of atoms and B is related to the average kinetic energy of the atoms, or, equivalently, the temperature. This function, which is similar mathematically to those that occur in many simple statistical problems is commonly designated the Maxwell distribution law, or, alternately, the Maxwell-Boltzmann law, in recognition of the work of Ludwig Boltzmann (1844-1906), who greatly extended research on statistical assemblies.

When Maxwell used his distribution law to calculate the viscosity of his ideal gas, he was surprised to find that the result was independent of pressure, or density. The same was found to be true of thermal conductivity. Careful measurements of the viscosity and thermal conductivity of several gases, carried out at home with the aid of his wife, confirmed the theoretical results for appropriate lower ranges of pressure. This success demonstrated that the theory could be used for other calculations. It also provided a basis for estimating atomic size and an accurate determination of Avogadro's number.

Clausius pointed out some errors in Maxwell's 1860 treatment of diffusion and conduction of heat, which Maxwell corrected in 1866.[14]. In the same work Maxwell modified his theory in consequence of the results of his experiments on the viscosity of air at different temperatures. Further he introduced an intermolecular repulsive force depending on intermolecular distance R as R−5.

Maxwell's demon

In 1868 Maxwell mentioned in a letter to his friend Tait a finite being ("Maxwell's demon")[15] that could violate the second law of thermodynamics. This law had been formulated in the 1850s by William Thomson and Rudolf Clausius. Clausius stated that it is impossible that heat flows spontaneously up a temperature slope, i.e., heat does not go naturally from a low temperature bath to one of higher temperature; work is required to achieve such a transport of energy.

Maxwell thought up a vessel, filled with an ideal gas, that is divided into two partitions A and B by a division in which there is a small hole. The hole is guarded by a being, Maxwell's demon, who can see the individual molecules and who opens and closes the hole, so as to allow only the swifter molecules to pass from A to B and only the slower ones to pass from B to A. He or she will, thus, without performing any work raise the temperature of B and lower that of A. The internal energy of an ideal gas being proportional to temperature, the demon decreases the energy of A and increases that of B. In other words, the demon causes heat to flow from the low temperature partition (A) to the high temperature partition (B) without expenditure of work, in contradiction to Clausius' expression of the second law. Since this process is the opposite of a natural (spontaneous) process in which entropy increases, it is clear that the entropy of the total system A + B decreases by the action of Maxwell's demon.[16]

Much has been written about a solution of this paradox. A simple-minded answer is that, according to quantum mechanics, individual molecules are indistinguishable, so that the demon cannot see individual molecules. A different solution was discussed by Leo Szilard in 1929,[17] who argued that the demon is part of the total system and that the demon's entropy increases by receiving and storing information. The demon's increase in entropy must be added to the total entropy and thus cancels the decrease in entropy of the gas in the two chambers. For refinements of Szilard's argument, other solutions, and the relation of entropy to information theory, see Ref.[18] A web source, describing the paradox and its solutions, is in Ref.[19]

Electricity and magnetism

James Clerk Maxwell's derivation of the classical field equations of electromagnetism represents his greatest triumph. The accomplishment places him in the rank of the very great physicists, such as Galileo, Newton, and Einstein.

On Faraday's Lines of Force

As an undergraduate in Cambridge University, Maxwell read Michael Faraday's Experimental Researches in Electricity (1839-1855), in which Faraday explained magnetism by force lines traversing space, instead of by actions at a distance. Thomson had cast some of Faraday's ideas into mathematical form and guided by his work Maxwell went a step further. In his first paper on electromagnetism (1855), entitled On Faraday's Lines of Force,[20] one of his aims was to overturn the idea of action at a distance.[21]

Maxwell presented a—what he called—geometrical model of lines of force in space. This representation rested on equipotential surfaces (scalar functions) to which the force lines (gradient vectors) are orthogonal and give paths of steepest descent from one equipotential surface to the next. Maxwell was guided by the physical analogy of incompressible fluids; not that Maxwell believed electricity to be a fluid, but he recognized the mathematical analogy of field lines to the velocity vectors of flowing fluids.

On Physical Lines of Force

Five years later, in 1861, Maxwell returned to the subject and wrote a series of four papers entitled On Physical Lines of Force.[22] In this work he introduced a mechanical ether model, based on "molecular vortices" and "idle wheel particles", that is rather foreign to the modern reader. However, he inferred two momentous consequences: the usual conduction current has to be augmented with a displacement current and the ether sustains transversal vibrations propagating with a velocity c, the speed of light.

To put the second consequence into perspective it must be recalled that in 1856 c had been measured by Wilhelm Eduard Weber and Rudolf Kohlrausch as the factor connecting two different definitions of electric charge (see statcoulomb and abcoulomb): by Coulomb's law and by Ampère's equation. Almost immediately Gustav Kirchhoff noticed that their value of c was surprisingly close to the speed of light determined by Hippolyte Louis Fizeau in 1849. And now Maxwell had shown that electromagnetic waves propagate with exactly the same speed.

In the introduction of part III of his On Physical Lines of Force Maxwell puts forward the supposition that there is only one medium, one ether, carrying both light and electromagnetic phenomena. On p. 22 of the same paper, he writes the following paragraph which is one of the landmarks in the history of the exact sciences:

The velocity of transverse undulations in our hypothetical medium, calculated from the electro-magnetic experiments of MM. Kohlrausch and Weber, agrees so exactly with the velocity of light calculated from the optical experiments of M. Fizeau, that we can scarcely avoid the inference that light consists in the transverse undulations of the same medium which is the cause of electric and magnetic phenomena.

A Dynamical Theory of the Electromagnetic Field

In 1865 Maxwell wrote his most important paper A Dynamical Theory of the Electromagnetic Field,[23] in which he introduces a set of equations, now known as the Maxwell equations. This paper is very accessible, also by the modern reader, because he abandoned his mechanical model of vortices and idle wheels, and only applies concepts that are still being taught in modern university courses. He presents twenty equations, divided in eight groups labeled (A) to (H), with twenty variables. Since he did not yet know vector or quaternion notation the different components of his vector fields are counted as individual parameters and the equations are written out in components.

We will present his equations in modern vector form and precede them by Maxwell's own comment in italics:

(A)

The relation between electric displacement, true conduction, and total current, compounded of both.

Here the total current density j is defined a the sum of the conduction current density i and displacement current (the time derivative of D).

(B)

The relation between the lines of magnetic force and the induction coefficients of a circuit, as already deduced form the laws of induction.

The magnetic field B is a divergence-free field and hence can be written as the curl of a vector potential A. It is remarkable that the modern Maxwell equation · B = 0, which states that B is divergence-free, is not among the basic equations given by Maxwell.

(C)

The relation between the strength of a current and its magnetic effects according to the electromagnetic system of measurement.

This is the Maxwell equation that is the extension of Ampere's equation by the displacement current. The equation takes different forms in different systems of units: sometimes the factor 4π is absent, sometimes there is division by c.

(D)

The value of the electromotive force in a body, as arising from the motion of the body in the field, the alteration of the field itself, and the variation of electric potential from one part of the field to another.

This equation gives in fact the Lorentz force on a particle of velocity v and unit charge. The last two terms represent the force due to the electric field, with Ψ the (scalar) electric potential. It seems that Maxwell only considered the case v = 0 in all his subsequent work. For v = 0 this equation can be converted by taking the curl on both sides, and using that the curl of a gradient is zero: × Ψ = 0. It thus becomes the Maxwell equation that is equivalent to Faraday's law.

(E)

The relation between electric displacement, and the electromotive force which produces it.

This is a constitutive relation between electric field and displacement; it holds for an isotropic and linear medium.

(F)

The relation between an electric current, and the electromotive force which produces it.

This is basically Ohm's law, with r the specific resistivity.

(G)

The relation between the amount of free charge at any point, and the electric displacements in the neigbourhood.

Here is ρ the electric charge density and hence this is the Maxwell equation that is equivalent to Gauss' law.

(H)

The relation between the increase or diminution of free electricity and the electric currents in the neighbourhood.

This is the equation of conservation of electric charge (equation of continuity).

The twenty variables recognized by Maxwell are (the components of):

The Treatise

Maxwell's electrical work was ultimately summed up in his Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism[3]. The first edition appeared in 1873, the second in 1881, after the author's death, and was edited by W. D. Niven, although it had been revised in part by Maxwell. The third edition, 1891, was edited by Joseph John Thomson. The book is not a systematic treatise in the ordinary sense, and it would be hard to go through it from cover to cover. It contains lots of interesting material and insights, but this has to be digged out the hard way. Maxwell's equations appear only in Chapter IX of part 4, well into the second half of the second volume. Maxwell uses both component and quaternion notation. The book appeared to contemporary physicists, and even to the immediate following generations, as a great but inaccessible monument.

External links

All Maxwell's published scientific papers

James Clerk Maxwell Foundation

References and notes

  1. For instance, James' great-grandmother from father's side was Dorothea, Lady Clerk Maxwell. She was the daughter of William and Agnes (née Maxwell) Clerk Maxwell. Dorothea married Sir George Clerk and—as usual in those day—carried the married name Clerk, instead of her father's name Clerk Maxwell.
  2. L. Campbell and W. Garnett, The Life of James Clerk Maxwell, MacMillan, London (1882) Online
  3. 3.0 3.1 J. Clerk Maxwell, A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism. Clarendon Press, Oxford. 1873.
  4. P. G. Tait, Elementary Treatise on Quaternions, Oxford 1867
  5. M. J. Crowe, A History of Vector Analysis, Dover, New York 1985. p. 129
  6. It is of interest to note in this context that the competing color theory (Zur Farbenlehre) of Young's famous German contemporary, Goethe, has had no impact on scientific color theory.
  7. J. Clerk Maxwell, On the theory of three primary colours. Proc. Royal Institution of Great Britain, vol. 3 pp. 370-374 (1861)
  8. R. M. Evans, Maxwell’s color photograph. Scientific American, vol. 205 pp. 118–127 (1961).
  9. R. C. Dougal, C. A. Greated, A. E. Marson, Then and now: James Clerk Maxwell and colour, Optics & Laser Technology vol. 38 (2006) pp. 210–218. An in-depth review of Maxwell's work on color theory with a link to present day applications of color science. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2005.06.036
  10. J. C. Maxwell, On the Stability of the Motion of Saturn's Rings, Monthly Notices, Astronomical Society of London, vol. 19, pp. 297-304 (1859)
  11. J. R. Newman, The World of Mathematics, vol. II, p. 774, excerpt from Daniel Bernouilli's book Hydrodynamica (1738)
  12. R. Clausius, On the mean length of the paths described by the separate molecules of gaseous bodies on the occurrence of molecular motion, Phil. Magazine, Ser. 4, vol. 17, pp. 81-91 (1859)
  13. J. Clerk Maxwell, Illustrations of the Dynamical Theory of Gases, I. On the Motions and Collisons of Perfectly Elastic Spheres, Phil. Magazine, Ser. 4, vol. 19, pp. 19-32 (1860) II. On the Process of Diffusion of Two or More Kinds of Moving Particles among one Another, Phil. Magazine, Ser. 4, vol. 20, pp. 21-37 (1860).
  14. J. Clerk Maxwell, On the dynamical Theory of Gases, read May 31, 1866; published in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, vol. 157, pp. 49-88 (1867)
  15. J. Clerk Maxwell, Theory of Heat, Longmans, Green, London (1871); reprinted Dover, New York (2001). Maxwell wrote about a "finite being", the name "demon" was coined by W. Thomson in 1874.
  16. One can confirm this easily for a monoatomic ideal gas by direct calculation. The energy of one mole of such gas is 3RT/2, with R the molar gas constant and T the absolute temperature. The entropy of one mole is S(T) = R ln(V·T 3/2) + S(0). Assume that the amount of gas in A and B stays constant (one mole each) during the demon's operation and that both partitions have the same volume V. By conservation of energy
    Assume further that the initial temperature of A and B is equal to T. Under these conditions the entropy change, caused by the demon, is
    Because the temperature decrease ΔTA is limited by TA = 0 and TA = T, it follows that the argument of the logarithm lies between zero and unity, and hence the logarithm is negative and so is the entropy change of A + B.
  17. L. Szilard, Über die Entropieverminderung in einem thermodynamischen System bei Eingriffen intelligenter Wesen. [On the decrease of entropy in a thermodynamic system by the intervention of intelligent beings]. Zeitschrift für Physik, vol. 53, pp. 840-856 (1929) doi
  18. Maxwell's Demon 2, Entropy, Classical and Quantum Information, Computing edited by Harvey S. Leff and Andrew F. Rex, Institute of Physics Publishing, Bristol, 2nd edition, 2003
  19. Maxwell's demon
  20. J. Clerk Maxwell, On Faraday's Lines of Force, Trans. Cambridge Philosophical Society, vol. 10, pp. 27-83 (1855)
  21. P. G. Tait in a posthumous article on Maxwell in the 1911 edition of the Encyclopedia Brittanica. Online
  22. J. Clerk Maxwell, On Physical Lines of Force, Philosophical Magazine 4th series, Four Parts, I: vol. 11, pp. 161-175; II: vol. 11, pp. 281-291, 338-347; III: vol. 13, pp. 12-23; IV: vol. 13, pp. 85-95 (1861, 1862).online
  23. J. Clerk Maxwell, A Dynamical Theory of the Electromagnetic Field, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., vol. 155, pp. 459 - 512 (1865) online)

Further reading

  • C.W.E Everitt, James Clerk Maxwell, Charles Scribner's Sons, New York (1975).
  • I. Tolstoy, James Clerk Maxwell, a biography. Edinburgh: Canongate; 1981.
  • B. Mahon, The man who changed everything. Chichester: Wiley; 2003
  • P. M. Harman, The Natural Philosophy of James Clerk Maxwell, Cambridge University Press, (1998).