Archive:Community Pages
Personal notes for reworking wiki pages, but open to comments. --Larry Sanger
I'm convinced that the whole set of introductory pages need a complete reworking. Here are some observations, questions, principles, etc.
- The landing page is simply too complicated. Too many links, too many words, will be off-putting to many people. It's all right to have a lot of links, perhaps, but it's not all right not to have a very simple presentation.
- It would be fine to have most of the detailed links on pages prominently linked from the main page, but they have to be quite obvious. They have to be clearly labelled, clearly placed, and most importantly, the whole set of them has to be clearly conceptually organized.
- Some candidate "top topics," i.e., categories of stuff that someone landing on CZ might be interested in: a few good articles; approved articles; entry points; an entertaining summation of "what we're all about"; donation; recent changes; project home; a welcome letter; explanation of how to get started as a contributor (for general public and for editors); policies.
Questions
OK, what are the questions or properties that I need to explore in organizing these various help and policy pages?
- Who are these pages for, and what is their purpose?
The pages are for (1) new people, who need both motivation and simple explanation; (2) regular contributors, who need clear, easy-to-find answers to help and policy questions; and (3) decision-makers, who need clearly-stated rules that they can proceed to interpret.
The pages basically two purposes, therefore: they motivate people to work; they explain policy at basic and in-depth levels.
- What are the best ways to achieve that purpose? What are some common tips, "best practices," etc.?
- Few mouseclicks to the most popular information.
- A "logical," or "clear," or "common-sensical" sort of organization. Information should be where you'd expect it to be.
- We've said we want to have a minimal rule set. Is this really advisable? Why or why not? How can we describe the "minimum" adequate set of rules?
- What is the overall structure of the pages?
- Should we have categories or templates for navigation?
- Should they all be in the CZ: namespace, some in the Help: namespace?
- What's the maximum amount of information that should go on a page? What's the "right size" for a page?
- What are some basic requirements of clear exposition of rules and help pages?
- How should the structure be filled out?
List of things to organize
Introductory and getting-started
Help/how to
Policy
|
Organization
Initiatives
Article lists
Communication
Tools
Miscellaneous
|
New user observation
Hi Larry. Something that struck me as I have been educating myself about CZ these recent days has been the absence of a left menu "Help" link in the basic CZ page template. "Support" was the closest but that was not it. When I have wanted to learn something (either editing tips or policy matters) I have needed to hunt them down. I notice a help section mentioned above but thought it worth mentioning that a 'one-click' "Help" as a single line link at left of every page would really (ahem) help. --Ian Johnson 10:11, 27 July 2007 (CDT)