Talk:Measure (mathematics): Difference between revisions

Revision as of 04:38, 7 February 2007

It is really enjoyable for a non mathematiciation to see this here, and easy to read too David Tribe 16:27, 25 January 2007 (CST)

Just a few thoughts to remember (how to reorganize this)

separate particular examples from general classes (now Dirac measure is at the same logical level as Borel or Radon measure)
sigma-finite and completeness are more or less at the same logical level (classes of measures)
counterexamples should be moved to the lead to give some motivation or explication for the need of the sigma-algebras.
application - it would be nice to mention that some basic probability theory may be viewed as a direct application of the measure theory (identifying basic correspondence, definition of probability, types of convergence etc)

Aleksander Halicz 03:38, 7 February 2007 (CST)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 It is really enjoyable for a non mathematiciation to see this here, and easy to read too [[User:David Tribe|David Tribe]] 16:27, 25 January 2007 (CST)
+== remarks ==
+Just a few thoughts to remember (how to reorganize this)
+* separate particular examples from general classes (now Dirac measure is at the same logical level as Borel or Radon measure)
+* sigma-finite and completeness are more or less at the same logical level (classes of measures)
+*counterexamples should be moved to the lead to give some motivation or explication for the need of the sigma-algebras.
+* application - it would be nice to mention that some basic probability theory may be viewed as a direct application of the measure theory (identifying basic correspondence, definition of probability, types of convergence etc)
+[[User:Aleksander Halicz|Aleksander Halicz]] 03:38, 7 February 2007 (CST)