Talk:Taj Mahal
There are significant problems with this article at the moment which I am trying to resolve on wikipedia - essentially, the theories of P.N. Oak are fringe theories given undue prominence within the article (some of the assertions aren't just confined to the P.N. Oak section), although they are increasingly believed as fact in India where the denial of Islamic prominence in their architectural history is finding resonance as political tensions become more strained with Pakistan. I'm rewriting the wikipedia article under my sock joopercoopers and hope to have it completed in a month or so - I'll post it here then. --Russ McGinn 18:30, 29 January 2007 (CST)
mmmm. well I didn't finish it there - I'm bringing it over here to work on it. - Or is the form to work on articles in user subpages and then post to mainspace. --Russ McGinn 08:52, 25 June 2007 (CDT)
No, this works. Now people can help with it if they want. I updated the metadata checklist to show that it still needs some cleanup from Wikipedia (take out the templates, etc..). Otherwise you are good to go. --Matt Innis (Talk) 10:26, 10 September 2007 (CDT)
NOTICE, please do not remove from top of page. | |
I released this article to Wikipedia. In particular, the identical text that appears there is of my sole authorship. Therefore, no credit for Wikipedia content on the Citizendium applies. | |
Check the history of edits to see who inserted this notice. |
- This article is all my own work from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Joopercoopers/Taj_Mahal/restructure --Russ McGinn 10:42, 10 September 2007 (CDT)